DOI: https://doi.org/10.26089/NumMet.v26r426

Control of the Gasoline Catalytic Reforming Process Based on a Kinetic Model Using an Artificial Neural Network

Authors

  • Kamila F. Koledina
  • Radmir R. Minigaliev
  • Sergey N. Koledin

Keywords:

catalytic reforming of gasoline
oil refining
machine learning
neural networks
Python
MATLAB
predictive modeling
data processing
deep learning
process control

Abstract

This study presents an approach to accelerated modeling of one of the key processes in the oil refining industry — catalytic reforming of gasoline — using a deep neural network. The product of catalytic reforming constitutes the majority of commercial gasoline and determines its octane number. In addition, aromatic hydrocarbons are formed during the process, the content of which can be regulated by adjusting the reaction conditions. The aim of the study was to develop a model capable of replacing resource-intensive direct calculations for evaluating the output parameters of the process, thereby enabling real-time analysis and control. Traditional methods require significant time and computational resources, making them unsuitable for rapid deployment in industrial environments. The training dataset was generated based on the results of direct simulations performed in MATLAB. A significant reduction in data generation time was achieved through the use of parallel computing. Optimal hyperparameters for the neural network were identified. Model training was carried out using the minimization of the mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²). The developed model demonstrates high prediction accuracy with minimal computational time, which makes it especially suitable for implementation in automated control systems at oil refineries. The resulting neural network approximation effectively acts as a simulator capable of instantaneously estimating key parameters of the catalytic reforming process, including reformate yield, content of aromatic hydrocarbons and benzene, and the octane number of the mixture.



Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

Issue

Section

Methods and algorithms of computational mathematics and their applications

Authors

Kamila F. Koledina

Ufa State Petroleum Technical University (USPTU),

Department of Information Technology and Applied Mathematics

• Professor, Senior Researcher

Radmir R. Minigaliev

Ufa State Petroleum Technical University (USPTU),

Department of Information Technology and Applied Mathematics

• Student

Sergey N. Koledin

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Department of Information Technology

• Associate Professor


References

  1. V. F. Zinnatullin and S. N. Koledin, “Method of Minimizing Residues in the Process of Gasoline Compounding Based on the Integration of Linear Programming and Neural Network,” Electrical and Information Complexes and Systems 20 (1), 132-140 (2024).
    doi 10.17122/1999-5458-2024-20-1-132-140
  2. M. L. Zymbler, A. A. Yurtin, “Imputation of missing values of a time seriesbased on joint application of analytical algorithms and neural networks,” Numerical Methods and Programming (Vychisl. Metody Programm.) 24 (3), 243-259 (2023).
    doi 10.26089/NumMet.v24r318
  3. V. I. Golubev, M. I. Anisimov, “Experience of applying convolutional neural networksto inverse problems of seismic exploration,” Numerical Methods and Programming (Vychisl. Metody Programm.) Special Issue, 46-61 (2024).
    doi 10.26089/NumMet.2024s04
  4. S. E. Shuljaka, “Current Aspects of Industrial Reformate Fraction Utilization,” Technologies of Oil and Gas, N 3(92), 25-28 (2014).
  5. S. I. Spivak, K. F. Koledina, S. N. Koledin, and I. M. Gubaydullin, “The Information–Analytical System of Theoretical Computing Optimization of Catalytic Processes,” Applied Informatics 12 (1), 39-49 (2017).
  6. M. Sakharov, K. Koledina, and I. Gubaydullin, “Optimal Control of Hydrocarbons’ Hydrogenation with Catalysts,” Mathematics 12 (22), Article Number 3570 (2024).
    doi 10.3390/math12223570
  7. R. Z. Zainullin, K. F. Koledina, A. F. Akhmetov, and I. M. Gubaidullin, “Kinetics of the Catalytic Reforming of Gasoline,” Kinet. Catal. 58 (3), 279-289 (2017) [Kinetika i Kataliz 58 (3), 292-303 (2017)].
  8. R. Z. Zaynullin, K. F. Koledina, I. M. Gubaydullin, et al., “Kinetic Model of Catalytic Gasoline Reforming with Consideration for Changes in Reaction Volume and Thermodynamic Parameters,” Kinet. Catal. 61 (4), 613-622 (2020) [Kinetika i Kataliz 61 (4), 550-559 (2020)].
  9. K. F. Koledina, I. M. Gubaydullin, S. N. Koledin, and Sh. G. Zagidullin, “Multicriteria Optimization of Gasoline Catalytic Reforming Temperature Regime Based on a Kinetic Model with Grouped Hydrocarbons,” React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 135 (1), 135-153 (2022).
    doi 10.1007/s11144-021-02070-0
  10. D. Iranshahi, S. Amiri, M. Karimi, et al., “Modeling and Simulation of a Novel Membrane Reactor in a Continuous Catalytic Regenerative Naphtha Reformer Accompanied with a Detailed Description of Kinetics,” Energy & Fuels 27 (7), 4048-4070 (2013).
  11. A. I. Diveev, S. V. Konstantinov, and E. A. Sofronova, “A Comparison of Evolutionary Algorithms and Gradient-Based Methods for the Optimal Control Problem,” Proc. of the 2018 5th Int. Conf. on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Thessaloniki, Greece, April 10-13, 2018, pp. 259-264.
    doi 10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394805
  12. S. Hawkins, H. He, G. Williams, and R. Baxter, “Outlier Detection Using Replicator Neural Networks,” in Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery , Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2454. Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 170-180.
    doi 10.1007/3-540-46145-0_17
  13. L. N. Yasnitsky and E. G. Plotnikova, “A Neural Network Algorithm for Identifying and Removing Outliers in Noisy Data Sets,” Applied Informatics 19 (5), 88-100 (2024).
  14. M. Dli, A. Puchkov, and M. Maksimkin, “Software Model of an Intelligent Control System for Complex Processes of Small-Scale Ore Processing,” Applied Informatics 19 (6), 96-112 (2024).
  15. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016.
  16. C. C. Aggarwal, Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook. Springer, Champaign, 2018.
  17. J. Howard and S. Gugger, Deep Learning for Coders with Fastai and PyTorch. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2020.
  18. A. I. Diveev, S. V. Konstantinov, and E. A. Safonova, “A Comparison of Evolutionary Algorithms and Gradient-Based Methods for the Optimal Control Problem,” Proc. of the 2018 Int. Conf. on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Thessaloniki, Greece, April 10-13, 2018. 259-264.